West Coast Environmental Law
Research Foundation
NewsletterThe Canadian Bar Association adopted a wide-ranging package of environmental law recommendations at its Mid-Winter Meeting in Regina, Saskatchewan, on February 26.
The proposals cover environmental impact assessment, citizen access to environmental justice, solid wastes, toxic contamination, enforcement, marine conservation, endangered species, forestry, migratory birds, the Arctic and climate change. The full text of the resolution is reprinted on Page 2 and 3 of this Issue.
The proposals are based on Sustainable Development in Canada: Options for Law Reform, a recently published book prepared by the CBA's Sustainable Development Committee. WCELA's Bill Andrews played an active role on the Committee. The book's 22 chapters were written by a wide variety of legal experts.
The book parallels a book called Law Reform for Sustainable Development in British Columbia edited by WCELA's Calvin Sandborn and released by the CBA B.C. Branch in June, 1990. Limited copies of the B.C. book are available from WCELA. For copies of the federal book, contact the CBA Ottawa: (613) 237-2925.
WCELA has asked federal minister of agriculture Don Mazankowski to implement critically important recommendations made recently by the Federal Pesticide Registration Review Team:
WCELA also called on the Minister to establish a special pesticide tax that would be used to finance alternative pest control research. Such taxes have been established in such jurisdictions as Denmark and the State of Iowa.
For copies of the Review Team's Report, contact: Communications Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C5.
The following is the text of a resolution passed by the Canadian Bar Association at its mid-Winter meeting in Regina, Saskatchewan, on February 26, 1991.
WHEREAS The Canadian Bar Association at its Annual Meeting in Vancouver in August 1989 confirmed a strong commitment to promoting sustainable development in Canada, resolving to:
1. endorse the goal of sustainable development [[Footnote: (1) -- 1. . "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs", World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, 1987, p.43.
End of Footnote]] z2. commit itself to ensure that its law reform activities promote the goal of sustainable development;
3. encourage its Branches, Sections and Members to participate actively in efforts towards sustainable development;
4. urge the federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments in Canada to review and reform their legislation, regulations, policies and programs in order to promote sustainable development; and
5. call on other professional associations, industry, academia, labour, governments and the public to work together to foster sustainable development in Canada and worldwide;
WHEREAS The Canadian Bar Association formed a Sustainable Development Committee of forty-three participants from across Canada, and the Committee has prepared a Report identifying key national and international law reform issues entitled Sustainable Development in Canada: Options for Law Reform;
WHEREAS a motion to receive the Report of the Sustainable Development Committee was passed at the Annual Meeting of The Canadian Bar Association in London, England in September 1990;
BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Canadian Bar Association urge the adoption of the following measures to promote sustainable development:
1. that the Government of Canada take strong measures to protect the environment and promote sustainable development to the full extent of its constitutional authority, including, where appropriate, under its peace, order and good government power;
2. that the Government of Canada demonstrate its commitment to promoting sustainable development by legislating an environmental impact assessment process which:
a) ensures full public participation;
b) covers all areas of federal responsibility, all types of new and existing initiatives (including policy, planning and expenditures) as well as regulatory activities and permitting practices, and;
c) which provides for:
i) an independent review agency with authority to grant or deny approval of initiatives;
ii) intervenor funding and awards of cost during the course of public hearing; and
iii) mandatory environmental impact analyses regarding proposed cabinet decisions;
3. that the Government of Canada demonstrate its commitment to improving public access to environmental justice by modifying relevant federal statutes:
a) to broaden the rules of standing in environmental matters, including in respect of civil liability, injunctive and declaratory relief and upon judicial review;
b) to improve citizen suits and civil remedies for the violation of environmental statutes and regulations;
c) to remove statutory limits on the quantum of civil liability for environmental damages where they currently exist; and
d) to legislate a rule-making process for the development of environmental regulations to enhance the opportunities for public input;
4. that the Government of Canada affirm its commitment to reducing solid wastes in Canada by:
a) adopting federal procurement policies which give preference to products and material that are recyclable, contain recycled material or are otherwise environmentally sound; and
b) requiring labelling of products and materials in Canada to communicate whether the product or material is recyclable of otherwise environmentally sound and other relevant information, including recommendations as to environmentally sound use and disposal;
5. that the Government of Canada adopt a national strategy to address the problem of toxic contamination and set a national regulatory goal of zero discharge for persistent toxic chemicals;
6. that the Government of Canada strengthen the enforcement of federal environmental legislation in Canada, especially by:
a) promulgating clear standards to enable precise verification of compliance;
b) legislating expanded investigation and enforcement powers, including a wide array of sanctions; and
c) formulating and submitting for public review and comment written enforcement and compliance policies and the details of any proposed or existing federal-provincial agreements for the administration and enforcement of federal environmental statutes;
7. that the Government of Canada show its commitment to conservation of the marine environment by:a) developing regional action plans for internationally shared marine areas and specific protocols for the setting of regional standards and to address land-based pollution, ocean dumping, special-areas protection, and liability for compensation for marine spills; and
b) adopting an Oceans Act, launching a national coastal-zone management program, and establishing a coordinated and integrated process for designating and managing protected marine areas;
8. that the Government of Canada:
a) participate actively in the formulation of international agreements on biodiversity and forestry within the framework of the United Nations and its 1992 Conference on Environment and Development, and future treaties on wildlife and habitat.
b) implement the North American Waterfowl Management Plan on migratory birds agreed to by Canada and the U.S.A. in 1986, and accede to the 1979 UNEP Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals; and
c) adopt legislation within the scope of federal jurisdiction to conserve efficaciously Canadian and foreign wildlife, endangered species and their habitat subject to the recognition of the traditional use by aboriginal people of wildlife habitat for harvesting and subsistance activities;
9. that the Government of Canada demonstrate its commitment to the conservation of the Arctic environment by developing an international strategy which recognizes the rights of aboriginal people and includes:
a) review of existing and development of new international agreements to regulate internationally shared resources according to the principle of sustainable development; and
b) reaching agreement with the United States, the Soviet Union and other circumpolar states to ensure the environmental and socioeconomic assessment and ongoing regulation of projects which have or may have an impact on Arctic ecosystems and Indigenous people;
10. that the Government of Canada take a leading role in the development and implementation into domestic law of international instruments, including conventions and protocols, regarding the protection to the atmosphere and the regulation of climate change.
Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Fraser Valley Petroleum Exploration, by David Anderson, Commissioner, January, 1991, Province of B.C. This report concludes that the risks of exploratory drilling in the Fraser Valley are slight but that the benefits, from the energy security, economic and environmental points of view, may be considerable. Among fifty-nine wide-ranging recommendations is a call for new provincial legislation on groundwater, contaminated soil, endangered species, strengthening of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Act, an Ontario-type "Spills Bill", intervenor funding and provisions for municipal noise by-laws.
IMPACT, Newsletter of the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office (FEARO), Vol. I, No. 1, January 1991. To get on the mailing list for this collection of pithy summaries of federal environmental assessments contact: FEARO, 13th floor - 200 Sacre Coeur Blvd., Hull, Quebec, K1A 0H3. Fax: (819) 994-1469.
FEARO, Pacific, Western & Northern Region, Newsletter, No. 1, February 1991. This is a one-page-both-sides supplement to the above Newsletter. Contact: (604) 666-2431.
(B.C.) Ministry of Native Affairs, Information Update, Land Claims Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1991. Yet another new government newsletter. Contact: Jamie Kelley, phone (604) 356-7895.
CONFERENCE: West Coast Land Trust Conference, April 12 to 14, 1991, at the Delta Pacific Inn, in Richmond, sponsored by the Turtle Island Earth Stewards. Conference speakers include land trust specialists, environmental lawyers, Native leaders, land stewards and owners. For information contact: (604) 736-9221.
Canada's most important environmental law case was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada on February 19 and 20. The Friends of the Oldman River, represented by Brian Crane, Q.C., argued against the Province of Alberta's attempt to overturn the Federal Court of Appeal's decision requiring the federal government to apply its Environmental Assessment Review Process (EARP) to a dam project in southern Alberta.
Shortly afterward, the Rivers Defence Coalition, represented by WCELA Honorary Director Dr. Andrew Thompson, appeared in the Federal Court Trial Division on February 26, 27 and 28 to challenge the Alcan Settlement Agreement. The court heard argument on motions by Alcan and the federal government to quash the case and no decision has yet been given. The Coalition received an additional grant from the Fund on February 19 because of the additional legal work necessary to challenge the federal government's Order in Council purporting to exempt the Kemano Completion Project from the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Process. A decision is not expected before the Fall of 1991.
Meanwhile, reasons for decision have not yet been given by the Federal Court Trial Division following its rejection of `EARP cases' by the Fraser River Coalition (dock expansion) and the Western Canada Wilderness Committee (Marbeled Murrelet). Thus, the groups are unable to file appeals in their attempts to require the federal government to follow its Environmental Assessment Review Process.
The Lawn Hill Residents' Association obtained a six-month deferral of a B.C. Government decision on approval of a logging road, to allow time for the Skeena-Queen Charlotte Regional District to prepare a land use plan for the area. The Association received a grant for legal services for lawyer Roderick Sutton to assist in its bid to stop the proposed logging road in an environmentally sensitive area.
Ira Zbarsky and the Branchflower Land Co-op lost their temporary injunction against clearcut logging by their neighbour. On February 8, the Court of Appeal refused to allow an extension of time for the plaintiffs to post financial security, which had been filed after a December 14, 1990, deadline. The Court of Appeal decision meant that a Supreme Court Order dissolving the plaintiffs' temporary injunction was allowed to stand. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court allowed a motion by the plaintiffs regarding the filing of security in the main case, allowing the plaintiffs' main case to continue. Thus, the current status is that the defendants can log while the plaintiffs wait for a date for the hearing of their appeal.
OUR MISTAKE: Fibreco Pulp Inc. received fines of $5,000 per day for each of 40 days for a total fine of $200,000 in December, 1990. There was a proofreading error in our February 12th, 1991 issue.
WCELRF Newsletter, copyright 1991, is published by the West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation. This issue was produced by Bill Andrews (editor), Morgan Ashbridge, Ann Hillyer, Dianne Howland, Catherine Ludgate, Shirely Peacock, Denice Regnier, and Calvin Sandborn. Subscription information is on page 3. WCELRF does research and education and maintains an environmental law library. The West Coast Environmental Law Association provides legal representation and promotes law reform. The mission of WCELRF and WCELA is to provide legal services to protect the environment and to foster public participation in environmental decision making. We are grateful to the Law Foundation of British Columbia for core funding of the West Coast Environmental Law Association and West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation. Donations to WCELRF are tax creditable.
West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation 1001 - 207 West Hastings Vancouver, BC V6B 1H7 Canada
phone: (604) 684-7378
fax: (604) 684-1312