West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation Newsletter

West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation Newsletter

Volume 17:3 September 21, 1993


Endangered Species Legislation Needed Now

West Coast Environmental Law Association is representing the East Kootenay Environmental Society, Earthlife and Land for Nature in asking the provincial government to pass a new endangered species law now. The new law should include, at a minimum, the following three provisions:

The current provincial statute dealing with endangered and threatened species only allows non-fish, vertebrate species to be designated as "endangered" or "threatened". Plants, invertebrates and fish are not included in endangered or threatened species protection. This must be changed in a new Act.

Destruction of habitat is probably the chief threat to most endangered species, and once a species has been designated, its habitat should receive automatic protection. The current law does not permit this to occur. Cabinet could be given the power to grant an exemption, if there is no reasonable and prudent alternative for meeting the same social objectives. Such a decision by Cabinet would be public, and subject to public scrutiny and debate.

All species that are truly endangered or threatened should be properly protected by law. Under the present Wildlife Act, the decision to designate a species as endangered or threatened is in the absolute and confidential discretion of Cabinet. One way to encourage Cabinet to make endangered species decisions based on the actual biological vulnerability of a species is to establish an Endangered Species Scientific Advisory Board.

The three points for legislation were widely discussed and agreed upon at the symposium on Community Action for Protection of Endangered Species held in Vancouver in September 1991. John Cashore, still in Opposition at that point, specifically agreed with the first and third recommendations. He did not agree that habitat would be automatically protected once a species was designated as endangered. He should be reminded of his promise, despite his recent move from Environment to Aboriginal Affairs, and his colleague, Moe Sihota, now Minister of Environment, should be asked to keep the same promise.

If you or your group would like to join the Endangered Species Coalition, or if you would like more information on this subject, please contact Linda Nowlan at West Coast Environmental Law Association.

Economic Instruments For Environmental Protection

West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation will be publishing a new report on economic instruments very soon. This report was prepared for Environment Canada. Here is a preview of the report.

The search for improved environmental protection -- and the urgency of the task -- challenges us to be ever alert to new or improved ways to accomplish our goal. Increasingly we recognize that our approach must encourage prevention rather than remediation of environmental degradation and that a variety of tools need to be used together to achieve this end.

Economic Instruments and the Environment: Selected Legal Issues examines the use of economic tools to improve environmental protection through the harnessing of market forces. These tools are not viewed as a single solution to environmental ills. However, an appropriate mix of environmental regulations and economic instruments may accelerate our progress to better environmental protection.

Canadian environmental law consists largely of regulations or permits and licences which prohibit industries from exceeding prescribed levels of emissions, require industries to install certain abatement equipment or prohibit the use of substances for specific purposes. If a business exceeds permitted levels or breaches regulations it can be charged with an offence and, if convicted, it can be punished by a fine or jail sentence. This "command and control" system of regulation has been successful in some areas of pollution. Atmospheric lead concentrations in Vancouver have dropped dramatically in the last fifteen years; the frequency of carbon monoxide concentrations in the Lower Fraser Valley exceeding air quality objectives has declined in the same period; and the discharge of organochlorines in pulp mill effluent has been reduced substantially in only a few years.(1) British Columbia, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, State of the Environment Report for British Columbia (Victoria: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, 1993) at 14 to 24.(1)

However, there is a growing recognition that command and control strategies have limitations in terms of its ability to modify destructive conduct through enforcement alone. To help address these issues, some environmental organizations and economists have advocated the use of economic instruments in conjunction with environmental regulations to create incentives for compliance. Economic instruments include discharge fees, product levies, taxes, deposit-refund systems, subsidies and tradeable permit systems. This report examines three economic instruments that can be used to improve environmental protection: discharge fees, deposit-refund systems and tradeable permit systems. The report addresses some of the legal issues related to the use of these instruments. It examines which government bodies have the constitutional power to adopt these instruments and what potential legal challenges governments might face if economic instruments are implemented. The emphasis in this report is on the legal issues related to the implementation of economic instrument rather than a comprehensive analysis of their overall effectiveness.

The first crucial legal issue is to determine which level of government has the power to implement an economic instrument.