|

WCEL
> Issues > Urban Growth and
Development > Smart Bylaws Guide > Case
Studies > Selkirk Waterfront
Smart Bylaws Guide – Case Studies – Selkirk Waterfront
Jutland Road at the waterfront, Victoria
A mixed-use neighbourhood
offers the potential for residents to work, shop, socialize,
attend school and reside in the same localized area. We
anticipate that a significant and increasing number of people
will walk or cycle to a work place at the Selkirk Waterfront.
- Selkirk Waterfront Urban Design Manual p.8 |
|
Features:
|
-
Brownfield
-
Oceanfront
-
Mixed-use
-
Affordable housing
-
Ecological restoration
- On-Site Stormwater Detention
- Recreation
- Comprehensive development zone
- Near downtown
|
|
Site Area:
|
10 hectares (24 acres)
|
|
Residential Units:
|
800 to 2,100 square feet
Function of building area and height (approximately 400
allowed; likely 250 will be built)
|
|
Commercial Units:
|
Total allowable building area 116, 170 square feet
|
|
Public Right of Way
|
4.35 acres (18%)
|
|
Site Coverage:
|
50% in residential areas, 80% in non-residential areas
|
|
Maximum Height:
|
One to six storeys
|
|
Parking:
|
260 off-street required by City; 190 on street; 150 in
parkade
|
|
Pre-development Usage:
|
Lumber mill
|
|
Date Completed:
|
From 1993 to 2005 (building permits obtained)
|
|
Developer:
|
Jawl Development Corporation, Mohan Jawl |
Project Overview
The Selkirk Waterfront is the redevelopment of the Victoria
Sawmill and brownfield site 2 kilometres north of downtown Victoria.
It is adjacent to the Gorge Waterway and Galloping Goose Regional
Trail, and is a fifteen minute walk from downtown. The 24 acre site
is a comprehensive development zone that allows industrial,
institutional, office, commercial, and residential uses in a variety
of building types. Services such as restaurants and a fitness
centre/rowing club attract non-residents to the area. An elementary
school and daycare operate on site, and the Vancouver Island
headquarters for Centra Gas provides a buffer from the heavy
industrial uses next door. The result is a vibrant mixed-use
neighbourhood that met the developer's primary goal -- to build a
project of which his grandchildren would be proud.
Land Use
The 24-acre site was used for a century for lumber milling and is
located between heavy industrial operations on the waterfront and a
residential neighbourhood. The developer purchased the site in 1991,
after the former owner, Fletcher-Challenge Canada Ltd., removed the
buildings on site (1989) and completed a government-mandated
environmental clean-up of soil contamination. The site achieved
Level B environmental status, a rating that allows residential uses.
The developer assumed the liability for further environmental
remediation. At every new excavation the developer monitors the
contamination levels in soil and has had to remove some hydrocarbon
contamination since acquiring the property.
In 1992 the developer obtained a rezoning from the City, from
heavy industrial to a comprehensive development zone, that allows
the City to continue to control use of the site to ensure adherence
to the original vision and approved neighbourhood concept. The
vision contained in the neighbourhood plan and Selkirk Waterfront
Design Guidelines is to create a vibrant mixed-use development that
can withstand market fluctuations and be safer than single-use
neighbourhoods because of the amount of activity occurring on site
from the early morning until late at night. With its proximity to
downtown and the waterfront, the site is attractive for residential,
business and recreational uses.
Selkirk is viewed as a social and recreational centre just north
of the downtown core. It includes:
- Central Gas Vancouver Island headquarters (light industrial);
- Government, business and professional services office space
(commercial/office);
- Low-rise apartments, condominiums, townhouses, and live-work
townhouses (residential);
- Institutional (Montessori school, daycare)
- Services (restaurants, pub, retail shops, physiotherapist,
hair studio, fitness centre, rowing club, kayak rentals);
and
- Access to recreation (Galloping Goose Regional Trail, Gorge
Waterway).
From south to north, the land uses flow from industrial to
residential and from pavement to natural area. The south to north
flow also mimics the phases of development, with the industrial and
commercial being built in the mid-1990's and the residential still
under construction.
All of the uses provide a buffer between a more and less
intensive use. The south end of the site is adjacent to heavy
industrial uses, which the Centra Gas operations on site buffer.
This buffer is important for preserving the City's industrial land
base and provided a stable income on the site to allow for the
phased development.
Moving north on the site, next to Centra Gas are office buildings
and institutional uses (a school and daycare), with service, retail
and lobby spaces in the ground floors. Finally, residential
buildings are clustered in the northern half of the site and
adjacent to the off-site Cecilia Creek and Galloping Goose Regional
Trail. Apartments and townhouses are located around Selkirk Green,
Viaduct Park and Cecilia Cove Park, and near the Cecilia Creek
Pathway.
Importantly, this redevelopment reconnects the Burnside-Gorge
neighbourhood with the waterfront that had been previously
inaccessible because of continuous industrial, transportation and
residential uses along the foreshore.
An interconnection of
work-place, home recreation and natural amenity will be
encouraged by designing streets for good walking and cycling
experiences, making a variety of routes to, from and through
the site, providing bicycle parking at every building, and
creating numerous stopping and sitting areas…Uses should be
allowed to change over time. - Selkirk Waterfront Urban Design
Manual p.8 |
A network of public open spaces extends throughout the site, and
the water's edge is publicly accessible from the streets, pathways
and boardwalks. Continuous waterfront access is provided by the
Railspur Boardwalk, built on the existing train trestle, and the
Steamtrain Quay that was constructed along the stream crane track.
The plaza at Sawmill Point, surrounded by cafes and restaurants on
the waterfront, is the focal point of public activity on the site.
The site is adjacent to the Galloping Goose Regional Trail, a
paved network for bikes, rollerbladers and pedestrians. Before the
project began and before the Galloping Goose was a regional trail,
the development team rejuvinated the section of the Goose beside the
site. The Goose extends across the Gorge Waterway over the 150 metre
Selkirk Trestle Bridge, and is now used as a significant
bike-commute corridor into downtown. The number of people who bike
to work at Selkirk is more than double the regional average, and
only 44% of employees drive alone to work compared with 61% in the
region. In addition, most employers participate in the BC Transit
ProPass Program that allows employees to purchase twelve months of
bus service for the price of ten.
As part of the rezoning the developer agreed to undertake some
environmental restoration of the site. This included stabilizing the
water's edge and restoring riparian vegetation, as well as planting
hundreds of trees. Along the waterfront, the developer retained some
of the industrial infrastructure in keeping with the site's historic
past, but also created an intertidal shelf and planted eelgrass beds
to provide spawning habitat for herring.
The developer installed new stormwater infrastructure, and added
oil interceptors to decrease the pollution entering the Gorge
Waterway. The roads are constructed of sand set pavers that allow
some infiltration to occur. A surface stormwater detention facility,
using bioswales and a pond, deals with the stormwater from the
southern two acres of the site where the parking garage will be
located. The City agreed to forego 27 surface parking spots on the
waterfront to accommodate this stormwater management facility and
amenity.
The first residential development was a 45 units non-market
housing complex that included a café, townhouses for single
parents, family townhouses on the lane, and seniors housing on top.
The developer obtained a grant from the BC Housing Management
Commission to build the project that is now owned and managed by the
Capital Region Housing Corporation. The developer retains ownership
of the commercial space in the building.
A complete variety of housing is available on site to create
flexibility and market resilience. In addition to the non-market
housing, Selkirk includes apartments and ground-oriented townhouses.
Several of the townhouses allow for live/work arrangements. Unit
sizes range from 800 to 2100 square feet.
The residential parking is located underground. Other parking is
dual use with office workers using it during the day and people
coming on site for recreation using it in the early morning and at
night. A parkade abutting the industrial land is under construction
because of increased density and daytime tenants indicating more
parking is needed. The City and developer agreed to build 100 fewer
spaces than is demanded by tenants to discourage single occupancy
automobile modes of travel to the site. At a savings of $16,000 per
space and one whole floor, the developer will undertake a
transportation demand management study. The parkade will also
contain more secure bike lock up than is required by the City, and
will provide a separate entrance for bikers.
The CD Zone allows the developer to:
- Transfer some of the floor space allocation for
office/commercial to residential;
- Use height and massing dimensions, not floor area ratio or
floor space ratio, as the main building criteria to allow for
innovation within the building envelope;
- Provides the developer with some flexibility as to what
density and types of uites are developed;
- Gives the municipality security that what is approved as the
CD zone plan and design guidelines will direct development
Design
The developer's urban design team worked with a technical
committee of municipal staff from the parks, engineering, and
planning departments, as well as the municipal administrator, to
oversee the planning and approvals process. This interdisciplinary
team met bi-weekly to resolve issues that arose in preparation for
rezoning and subdivision. The planning process moved along faster
than if each department had been asked to approve the project
separately because features that contravened a particular
profession's rule, for example narrow street widths, could be
addressed by the team in dialogue, rather than rejected and sent
back to the design team. Agreeing on the Urban Design Guidelines,
rezoning and subdivision took only nine months.
The developer produced an Urban Design Manual of detailed design
guidelines that were adopted by the City as part of the rezoning
application. These were the first such guidelines for a large scale
project in the City, and set a precedent. As some buildings were
designed and constructed by new owners, the developer wanted to
ensure continuity of design and attention to public spaces. See
Appendix A - Urban Design Objectives. The manual provides details on
the layout of the site and also contains development permit
requirements for the character of the buildings on site (massing,
height, entrances, wall cladding, roofs, colour, bike and car
parking, signs and walkways).
Equal attention was paid to designing public spaces as was
devoted to designing the buildings. The design also focused on
ensuring that there are eyes on the street (from cafes, townhouses,
public spaces) that would imply ownership and create safer streets.
Streets are shared by all types of uses. The bicycle routes are
the streets; if cars are traveling slowly enough they do not need
separate infrastructure. Traffic is slowed using sensory messages
(signs and paving texture), traffic islands and landscaped medians,
raised intersections and speed control, and textured pavement. The
streets are narrower and constructed with soft edges so the boundary
between the pedestrian and vehicle realms is blurred. This, coupled
with the use of textured bricks for pavement, slows traffic.
The design of the traffic circles was based on the City of Los
Angeles and City of Toronto engineering department specifications.
The fire department, City engineering, and BC Transit test drove
fire trucks, the top-heavy sewer pump truck and buses around the
traffic circles. The centre of the circles are designed to be rolled
over by larger vehicles.
The lanes are lower in the middle to allow for centre line
drainage so that non-elevated pedestrian areas at the sides of the
roads do not become stormwater conduits.
Traffic planning for the
Selkirk Waterfront has been conducted in a manner which
rejects the philosophy that the unencumbered rapid movement of
the private automobile is the primary criterion for the design
of streets and intersections. It takes instead as its starting
point the desire for an increased quality of life on and
around one of the most significant portions of the urban
public domain, the street. - Selkirk Waterfront Urban Design
Manual, p.29 |
Each building at Selkirk is equipped with bike storage, shower
and locker facilities.
Community Process
After a proposal by a previous owner to put a big box store on
the site, neighbourhood residents were up in arms about the
potential for increased traffic and the suitability of potential
uses for the site. The City and community were developing the
Burnside Neighbourhood Plan when the developer bought the property
in 1991. The Plan called for a mix of uses, "focusing on
residential development and a neighbourhood commercial centre to
serve the developing neighbourhood. One portion is of the site is
recommended for light industrial use as a buffer and transitional
use from the adjacent heavy industries."
The developer stepped into this community process and attended
community meetings to determine in what type of neighbourhood
Selkirk was located, and to tailor the development to meet the
interests of the various parties. Throughout the process the
development team asked community members what the issues were,
whether they agreed with the designs, and whether the team had
missed anything of importance for the neighbourhood. The development
team often interpreted municipal policy and bylaws for residents in
explanation of why some aspects of the project had to be designed in
a certain way.
The development team kept the project office open two evenings
per week for eight months, and made dozens of presentations at
community meetings. The developer revised the plans according to the
feedback provided by the residents, and the community association
endorsed the project when it went to City council. The Selkirk
Waterfront proposal went to the City at the same time as the third
draft of the Burnside Neighbourhood Plan. Both were endorsed by the
Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in March 1992.
The development team continues to provide updates at community
association meetings when new activities will be occurring on site.
Partnerships
The developer was keen to ensure that the mixed-use vision for
the site was successful. Key to this vision was to provide quality
services and amenities that would be attractive for people who had a
reason to be on the site (residents and daytime workers), as well as
others who would seek out Selkirk as a destination. To kick start
this ambiance before commercial and residential densities were high
enough to support it, the developer provided reduces rents to
restaurants. The rent for the food services uses are still based on
profitability. He also built the facilities for a rowing club and
donated them to the non-profit association that runs the club with
the expectation that a fitness facility would accompany the rowing
club. The fitness centre, run by the Olympian Silken Laumen, has now
been built.
City of Victoria
Selkirk was the first comprehensive development zone the City of
Victoria undertook, and it required new cooperation and approaches
at the staff level. For example, it was the first time the Parks and
Engineering Departments worked together to share the same
right-of-way space, and the development team had to prove to the
engineering and fire departments that traffic circles do work to
manage traffic safely. Key supporters included the Director of
Planning at the time and the city council.
Finally, as a result of the extensive community process
undertaken by the developer at Selkirk the City of Victoria now
requires all developers to consult with the appropriate
neighbourhood association before applying for a development permit.
Financing
The existing M3 heavy industrial zoning on the site allowed the
developer to respond to Centra Gas' request for proposals for a
Vancouver Island headquarters and post-emergency response facility.
The developer won the competition and secured a ten year lease,
which assisted him to carry the infrastructure costs for the
remainder of the development. After the rezoning, the Government of
BC bought a parcel of land on which to build an office building for
what was then the Ministry of Environment. The developer reinvested
the sale proceeds into the streetscapes to improve the saleability
of the residential component of Selkirk.
The non-market housing element was built with a grant from the
provincial government.
Challenges
Finally, in the early phase of the Selkirk Waterfront the
financial carrying charges were $3,000 per day. In response the
design team worked on the project full-time for a year and a half.
However, by using an integrated design and project management
approach, achieving agreement on the Urban Design Guidelines,
rezoning conditions and subdivision specifics took only nine months.
The anticipated build out for the project was seven years.
However, the B.C. leaky condominium crisis emerged as the first
market condominium project at Selkirk was being built. As a result,
this first building was used as an example of a rain screen
performance building to show the industry how condominiums should be
built. The crisis put a damper on the condominium market and slowed
the build out at Selkirk.
Parking is an ongoing issue. The developers would like to
minimize parking and work with employers to encourage non-automobile
travel to the site. The City does not want parking problems to spill
over into the neighbourhood. For example, the City of Victoria
required the designers to find pockets of parking to make up for the
"loss" of on street parking because of boulevard tree
bulges (used for traffic calming).
For more information
Developer Team:
Franc D'Ambrosio, Architect, (250) 384-2400, fdambrosio@fdarc.ca
Municipality:
Doug Koch, (250) 361-0282, dougk@city.victoria.bc.ca
Zoning: CD-1 Zone, Selkirk Comprehensive District
http://www.city.victoria.bc.ca/common/pdfs/planning_zoning_121.pdf
|