Banner _Pubs.jpg

Environmental Law Alert Blog

Through our Environmental Law Alert blog, West Coast alerts you to environmental law problems and developments affecting British Columbians. It is the public voice of our Environmental Law Alert unit which is a legal “watchdog” for BC’s environment.

If you have an environmental story that we should hear about, please e-mail Andrew Gage. Also, please feel free to comment on any of the posts to this blog – but please keep in mind our policies on comments.

2 February, 2012

In a January 20th letter, Canada’s Environment Minister, Peter Kent, assured Canadians that the Canadian Government, despite having withdrawn from the Kyoto Protocol, nonetheless has a plan on climate change.  But reading the letter, it’s pretty clear that that there is no real plan, unless you count planning to do nothing.  Not only have experts shown that the pieces of this plan will not achieve its goals, but a climate change plan does not address Canada's energy needs is no climate plan at all.  If we want to see what a real climate plan might look like, let’s look to the U.K., where successive Labour and Conservative governments have, unlike Canada’s governments, put in place real climate plans, and backed them up with laws and policies to achieve real results.

0 Comments
1 February, 2012

On January 30th, media, First Nations groups, activists and one law student intern crowded into a hotel room on the outskirts of Edmonton for a press conference held by the Yinka Dene Alliance. Alberta and Northwest Territories First Nations signed on to the historic “Save the Fraser Declaration” to oppose the export of tar sands oil to tankers on the BC Coast. As a law student intern newly started at West Coast Environmental Law, I was very interested to watch First Nations asserting their decisions under Indigenous law.

0 Comments
31 January, 2012

The federal government seems set on further gutting theCanadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA), and is expected to introduce “sweeping” regulatory changes to CEAA and related legislation in the House of Commons in the coming weeks. These changes could affect upcoming proposals for pipelines, tar sands projects, mines, small and large energy generation, and much more. It is possiblethe government could also use this opportunity to affect the process for projects currently in the environmental review process, like the Enbridge oil pipeline and supertanker, New Prosperity, or Site C Clean Energy Project proposals.

 

0 Comments
27 January, 2012

The record level of public engagement shown in the recent BC government consultations on cosmetic pesticides (8,700 people) shows that democracy is alive and well in BC. Whether you were one of the thousands of people who made their views known in that consultation or not, why not raise your voice for the environment in one of the other public consultations that the government is carrying out?  Right now you can make your views known on the government's proposed, sweeping "Environmental Mitigation Policy" and/or on a program to fund energy efficiency retro-fits through the energy savings that they generate. 

0 Comments
18 January, 2012

On January 13th, our Executive Director, Jessica Clogg, appeared on the Bill Good Show on CKNW radio, opposite blogger Vivian Krause, to defend West Coast against the recent American-style attack ads launched against us by the oil industry advocacy group, Ethical Oil.  Even though  Ms. Krause has distanced herself from the ads, the Ethical Oil campaign, in our view, vividly illustrates at least three sources of bias and misinformation in her work:

  • Krause’s so-called  “fair” questions are asked only of non-profit  environmental groups  - in this case the groups opposed to Enbridge (but not those who support it);
  • Krause, and Ethical Oil, mischaracterize the relationship between funders and fundees;  
  • Krause, and Ethical Oil, without any evidence, imply that U.S. charitable foundations are not advancing their charitable objectives (as required by charities law), but are instead advancing undisclosed national or corporate U.S. interests.
4 Comments
10 January, 2012

Recently the federal Ministers of the Environment and of Natural Resources have publicly confirmed that major changes may be in the works for federal environmental assessment (EA). And by all indications Canadians should be worried. Based on statements made in an open letter released January 9th, federal Natural Resources Minister Oliver appears to view the democratic right of citizens to be heard and the constitutional right of First Nations to be honourably consulted about, for example, large inter-provincial oil pipeline and tanker terminal projects as merely ‘exploiting loopholes’ in and ‘hijacking’ the regulatory process (which is designed to allow citizen participation) to achieve ‘radical’ agendas.

 

2 Comments
10 January, 2012

What began as a smear campaign against West Coast Environmental Law and other environmental groups has crossed a line with oil industry advocates EthicalOil.org and Ezra Levant (author of the book Ethical Oil) taking aim at the thousands of ordinary Canadians who have registered to express their concerns about the proposed Northern Gateway Pipelines - attacking them as "foreigners".  The truth is that somewhere in the neighbourhood of 99% – of the registrants are Canadians – with a large proportion from northern cities and towns of British Columbia – from the very communities most directly affected by the proposed pipelines and tanker traffic.  We hope that the about  4,500 Canadians and (a handful of) non-Canadians will not allow themselves to be intimidated by Ethical Oil’s misinformation campaign.

1 Comments
5 January, 2012

A recent ad campaign linked to a top oil sands firm questions what drives the work of West Coast Environmental Law.  Back in the ‘70s when a broad citizens’ coalition brought to a halt a proposed oil pipeline to an oil port at Kitimat, BC West Coast lawyers were there to support them. Our belief remains strong today, as then, that our salmon-rich north Pacific coast and rivers should remain free from oil supertankers and the threat of oil spills.  This goal, like the other long-term strategic priorities of West Coast Environmental Law is set by our board and staff, informed by the deep connections we have forged over many decades with communities in every corner of the province. Without the generosity of our supporters, including dedicated individual sand foundations on both sides of the border, the work of our non-profit charity to protect the environment through law would not be possible. But we, not our funders, decide what issues we will focus on.

10 Comments
22 December, 2011

BC has laws governing mining roads, other laws governing forestry roads and still other laws governing oil and gas roads.  And historically there’s been no real coordination between the companies building these different roads.  As a result, BC has an estimated 400,000 to 550,000 kilometres of unpaved resource roads (the government itself doesn’t know how many, and where they’re all located).  Last week West Coast Environmental Law submitted our comments on BC’s proposed Natural Resource Roads Act – a piece of legislation intended to better coordinate, and standardize the rules for, the building and maintenance of resource roads. 

0 Comments
16 December, 2011

With French-language CBC reporting that Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent is meeting far more often with the oil and gas industry than with environmental organizations, we have 2 questions.  First, what does that mean for Canada's environmental laws and policies?  Second, where is the English-language media coverage on this issue?

0 Comments