SAVE BC'S PUBLIC LANDS

Backgrounder on

Privatisation - Implications for Community Stability

Increased security of tenure for corporations, either by privatising or enhancing tenure rights, may lead to:

  • Increased corporate control over BC’s forests
  • Decreased opportunities for community forestry and the woodlot program.
  • Decreased opportunities for community decision-making or public input into forest management.
  • Decreased opportunities for the value-added sector
  • Increased mill closures due to mergers and centralization of operations
  • In some instances, increased raw log exports

Corporate Control

ALREADY:

  • 20 large timber corporations hold 86% of cutting rights to BC’s public forest resource.
  • The woodlot program comprises less than 1% of cutting rights.
  • Wood supply for small business mills is less than 5% of the provincial allowable annual cut, due to corporate influences such as surrogate bidding
  • Community forestry remains marginalized despite the new community forest pilot project, which must compete with the small business program and the woodlot program for marginal timber supply.
  • Demand for community forestry in BC is increasing. 88 BC communities submitted letters of interest for the pilot project. (Only 27 developed full proposals mainly because of financial constraints).

Privatisation and increased tenure rights for corporations will result in even greater corporate control and reduced opportunities for local forestry alternatives.

Mill Closures

ALREADY:

  • In response to a declining timber supply, BC’s timber corporations are centralizing and amalgamating operations. This means funnelling fibre to large mills in larger centres and shutting down mills in rural and remote regions. Recent examples of this are the Skeena, Gold River and Canfor mills

Privatisation would free companies from government’s authority under the Forest Act to require tenure holders to operate a processing facility.

Privatisation would break the link between jobs and fibre supply. For example, Section 71 of the Forest Act, which authorizes the Ministry to Forests to reduce a tenure holder’s AAC if the holder closes a processing facility, would no longer apply.

Raw Log Exports

ALREADY:

  • In 1998, 1.1 million cubic metres of raw logs were exported from BC, representing 12% of the total coastal harvest.
  • Despite temporary jobs, in the long term, raw log exports cost long-term revenue and employment, because products are manufactured outside of the province. In certain cases, private land rights give companies freedom from public raw log export restrictions.
  • This is the case for some of the lands within the Timber West and MacMillan Bloedel compensation packages — land within the E&N railway belt granted to companies prior to 1906.

Mechanization and Job Loss

ALREADY:

  • Corporate operations are increasingly capital intensive, rather than labour-intensive, replacing workers with machines.
  • In 1961, the forest sector produced 2 jobs per 1000 cubic metres of wood. By 1991, the number of jobs per 1000 m3 has declined to 0.88 jobs, even though the rate of cut in BC increased by 57%.

Several BC communities have developed models for forest management and planning which are labour intensive and promote long-term community stability. Greater corporatisation and privatisation will preclude communities from implementing alternatives.

Exporting Value-Added Jobs

ALREADY:

  • Value-added products represented only 8.5% of all solid wood exports for BC in 1997, compared to 30.6% for other Canadian provinces.
  • BC gets about 12.3% of its forestry jobs from the value-added sector, while Oregon gets 40%.
  • The value-added sector generates on average 4 times the number of jobs than primary manufacturing in BC

Industry plans for large scale privatisation are linked closely with intensive tree farming, a practice which results in the production of low value fibre products--mainly pulp and composites-- which are among the least labour-intensive processing industries.

For More Information


West Coast Environmental Law web site - Last modified on November 12, 2003.