SAVE BC'S PUBLIC LANDS
Backgrounder on
Privatisation - Implications for Community Stability
Increased security of tenure for corporations, either by privatising or
enhancing tenure rights, may lead to:
- Increased corporate control over BCs forests
- Decreased opportunities for community forestry and the woodlot program.
- Decreased opportunities for community decision-making or public input into forest
management.
- Decreased opportunities for the value-added sector
- Increased mill closures due to mergers and centralization of operations
- In some instances, increased raw log exports
Corporate Control
ALREADY:
- 20 large timber corporations hold 86% of cutting rights to BCs public forest
resource.
- The woodlot program comprises less than 1% of cutting rights.
- Wood supply for small business mills is less than 5% of the provincial allowable annual
cut, due to corporate influences such as surrogate bidding
- Community forestry remains marginalized despite the new community forest pilot project,
which must compete with the small business program and the woodlot program for marginal
timber supply.
- Demand for community forestry in BC is increasing. 88 BC communities submitted letters
of interest for the pilot project. (Only 27 developed full proposals mainly because of
financial constraints).
Privatisation and increased tenure rights for corporations will
result in even greater corporate control and reduced opportunities for local forestry
alternatives.
Mill Closures
ALREADY:
- In response to a declining timber supply, BCs timber corporations are centralizing
and amalgamating operations. This means funnelling fibre to large mills in larger centres
and shutting down mills in rural and remote regions. Recent examples of this are the
Skeena, Gold River and Canfor mills
Privatisation would free companies from governments authority
under the Forest Act to require tenure holders to operate a processing facility.
Privatisation would break the link between jobs and fibre supply. For
example, Section 71 of the Forest Act, which authorizes the Ministry to Forests to
reduce a tenure holders AAC if the holder closes a processing facility, would no
longer apply.
Raw Log Exports
ALREADY:
- In 1998, 1.1 million cubic metres of raw logs were exported from BC, representing 12% of
the total coastal harvest.
- Despite temporary jobs, in the long term, raw log exports cost long-term revenue and
employment, because products are manufactured outside of the province. In certain cases,
private land rights give companies freedom from public raw log export restrictions.
- This is the case for some of the lands within the Timber West and MacMillan Bloedel
compensation packages land within the E&N railway belt granted to companies
prior to 1906.
Mechanization and Job Loss
ALREADY:
- Corporate operations are increasingly capital intensive, rather than labour-intensive,
replacing workers with machines.
- In 1961, the forest sector produced 2 jobs per 1000 cubic metres of wood. By 1991, the
number of jobs per 1000 m3 has declined to 0.88 jobs, even though the rate of cut in BC
increased by 57%.
Several BC communities have developed models for forest management
and planning which are labour intensive and promote long-term community stability. Greater
corporatisation and privatisation will preclude communities from implementing
alternatives.
Exporting Value-Added Jobs
ALREADY:
Value-added products represented only 8.5% of all solid wood exports for BC in 1997,
compared to 30.6% for other Canadian provinces.
BC gets about 12.3% of its forestry jobs from the value-added sector, while Oregon gets
40%.
The value-added sector generates on average 4 times the number of jobs than primary
manufacturing in BC
Industry plans for large scale privatisation are linked closely with
intensive tree farming, a practice which results in the production of low value fibre
products--mainly pulp and composites-- which are among the least labour-intensive
processing industries.
For More Information
The Campaign to Save BCs Public Lands is a loose
network of social justice, environmental and labour groups that support a set of core
principles about resisting privatisation and promoting community control of forests, in a
manner that is fair to all British Columbians and respects the rights and title of First
Nations.
To find out more about the Campaign or for further information about
the material in this backgrounder, please contact:
|