SAVE BC'S PUBLIC LANDS

Backgrounder on

Privatisation - Environment Issues

Public lands are the heart and soul of BC. Public lands are the source of the pride citizen’s feel about being a part of beautiful BC. Public lands are the wealth the province and if we maintain these lands in public hands they will be the source of wealth for generations to come. Selling or trading BC's public lands for a few million dollars is a very short sighted approach.

Historically, logging companies in BC have done a very poor job of managing forestlands and protecting streams, fish, wildlife and drinking water. Current proposals to privatise or increase corporate control of these public (Crown) forestlands will not improve protection, rather it will reduce protection for these and other important environmental values. If the recent privatisation deal between the province and MacMillan Bloedel (MB) is completed, MB will be able to operate virtually unregulated on up to 120,000 hectares of land previously managed in the public interest.

Background

  • For many years, there were no laws to protect BC’s forests from the greed of the timber industry. In 1995, the BC government enacted the much-maligned Forest Practices Code. While the new rules did not provide strong protections for environmental values, they did provide rules to regulate company activities around some important environmental values such as streams and drinking water.
  • Now, after delaying five years, the government is just now implementing its long promised protections for wildlife and biodiversity. Unfortunately, companies are pushing for privatisation as a means avoiding public oversight and of returning to the good old days of lawless logging. These very same companies that have logged our public lands unsustainably for decades -- in the process demolishing salmon streams and pushing species to the brink of extinction-- now want us to trust their management of our forests, our water and our most threatened species.
  • If privatisation is not stopped, mandatory requirements that allow public access, buffer fish streams, protect against landslides, mitigate impacts on drinking water, protect roads from eroding, and limit rates of logging will be replaced by voluntary rules (written by the companies themselves) that provide much less protection than rules on public land.

Wildlife

  • After five years of delays, the BC government just recently began implementing protection for wildlife at risk. The long awaited Identified Wildlife Management Strategy (IWMS) will provide protection for almost 40 species of important wildlife and plants by creating small habitat areas where logging and roadbuilding will be restricted but not prohibited. Although the IWMS is capped so it can only impact the timber supply by 1%, companies have vigorously resisted implementation. If land is removed from public oversight, or privatised, companies will not have to implement habitat protection.
  • British Columbia and Canada, unlike the United States, have no laws that prohibit destruction of endangered species habitat on private land. Therefore, once areas are removed from public oversight or privatised, companies will be able to destroy habitat important to Grizzly Bears, Mountain Caribou, Northern Goshawks, Spotted Owls, Bull Trout, Vancouver Island Marmot and other threatened species. There will be nothing the government or the public can do to stop them.
  • The up to 120, 000 hectares of land that will now be free from effective environmental protections contains some of the best remaining wildlife habitat on Vancouver Island. Important protections for deer winter range do not apply on private land so MB will be able to log these important areas that would be protected on public land.

Streams and Fish

  • Rules on public land require that larger fish streams (>1.5m) are protected by unlogged buffers of trees 20-50 meters wide. The anticipated new private land regulations only suggest 20 trees every 200 meters be left standing on either side of fish streams 1.5 to 3.0 metres wide, and 40 trees every 200 metres for fish streams >3.0 m. If a company violates these weak, voluntary rules there will only be 4 enforcement officers in the entire province to check on them.

Drinking Water

  • While not sufficient to fully protect drinking water, rules on public land ensure that impacts on community drinking water are considered in forest planning. Laws for public land provide a modicum of protection from landslides, pesticides, road building and siltation. There are no equivalent rules for logging on private lands. If public land is privatised, citizens will have to trust logging companies to protect their water and health. The only option to stop any harmful logging activities will be unpredictable and expensive lawsuits.
  • If the land requested by MB is privatised, lands that provide the drinking water for Nanaimo, Duncan, and many smaller communities will be owned and controlled by MB with no mandatory rules for protection.

Biodiversity

  • The logging industry and government have delayed implementation of protection for old growth and biodiversity for almost five years. Just recently, government announced that mechanism protecting these values would be implemented over the next three years. Privatising public land and removing it from public oversight means that thousands of hectares will be exempt from these new rules.
  • The government’s anticipated new private land regulations provide no protection for biodiversity or old growth. Therefore, if the requested land is privatised and deregulated, MB will not have to leave any old growth or protect any biodiversity on the up to 120,000 hectares no longer covered by the Forest Practices Code.

Rate of Logging

  • Laws on public land regulate the rate of logging. There are no such rules on private land meaning vast areas can be progressively clear-cut.
  • On public land steep slopes, landslide prone areas, sensitive soils, and wetlands get modest protection. There are no rules to protect these sensitive areas on private land.

For More Information


West Coast Environmental Law web site - Last modified on November 12, 2003.